Nick Rosen |

Thinking of buying a new Apple laptop? Treat yourself to a ThinkPad instead. And save hundreds on energy as well as up to $1500 on the cost of the computer.

Ever since Apple Computers (APPL) pulled its laptops out of a voluntary eco-rating scheme (EPEAT) last year, its been pretty obvious that the company has lost touch with its West Coast roots and become just another greedy hardware supplier – albeit with a booming software catalog to pull in the punters.

Greenpeace’s Guide to Greener Electronics is into its 18th edition and benchmarks the best practices of electronics companies on three parameters — energy, climate products and sustainable operations. Indian company Wipro has an overall score of 7.1 on a scale of 10, the highest among the 16 companies surveyed.

HP dropped from the top spot in last year’s edition to second this year. Nokia moved up from No. 4 to No. 3, and Apple dropped from 5 to 6.

For those who remember Apple as the underdog in the battle to save the world from Microsoft, its galling to admit that there might now be better choices. Open Source computers might require a little more technical skill, but Linux-based hardware is more reliable than Apple in some cases, and far cheaper. The software is largely free, some of it even =am2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=B008XAXAC4″ title=”Apache Open Office, Free from Amazon” target=”_blank”>downloadable from Amazon.

What is more, the energy consumption figures in tests conducted by University academics show that Apple laptops are far and away the most energy intensive of all laptops, and anyone running computers off the grid should stay well away from them. New, lower-energy chips announced by Intel have been delayed and in any case only apply to the iPads, not the full-fledged computers. Certain models of Dell and Lenovo ThinkPad are the industry leaders in the low-energy rankings.

With its $80 billion cash pile, Apple is hardly a good corporate citizen. Its massive Chinese production plant at Foxconn is a nexus of misery with miserable workers and an awful suicide rate.

We never thought we would say it, but if you are going to by Chinese–made products, you might as well go for Lenovo, which bought the ThinkPad range from IBM. They are cheaper, lighter, longer-lasting and use far less energy.

They are also cheaper to repair.

We took a one-year-old MacBook to Apple recently with a power problem. The Bill was over $600, and Apple messed up the repair by stripping the head off one of the little screws that hold the case in, requiring a return visit to the store, where the manager’s apology seemed as about as sincere as Simon Cowell’s smile.

For more stories from search here

Our Our fastest solar ovenBake, roast or steam a meal for two people in minutes, reaching up to 550°F (290°C). GoSun Sport sets the bar for portable solar stoves.

Buy our book - OFF THE GRID - a tour of American off-grid places and people written by Nick Rosen, editor of the web site

7 Responses to “Apple products are wrong choice for energy-savers”

  1. OffGrid101

    hmm..controverial issue. would you actually give up your mac, and change to another hardware system. I’d rather hook it up to a solar system (like Goal Zero)…you?

  2. losgatos_dale

    Um, for the apple-ites who still believe pc’s have to be replaced every year or so, thats not the case. My first thinkpad (bought in 1993) still runs, and is a perfect candidate for Linux and off-grid use. Same with the Sony Vaio that I bought just over 6 years ago that I am typing on right now! -shrug-

  3. rev

    apple products tend to last longer so youre not having to dispose of a computer every year or so and by buying apple you are not supporting the disgusting eugenics programs of the microsoft tyrants

  4. Dustin

    i was a pc user for along time. There was always something going wrong with them. I have a apple, and don’t have near the problems.

  5. Mike

    I (honestly) have given the GreenPeace reviews of technology companies a read over the years and can’t find any really accurate information in them. They are wrong as it your comment (in agreeing with them) that Apple hasn’t gone back and backtracked to using EPEAT again. I am an Apple user and agree that they could do better; that alternatives exist that are less energy hungry (both in hardware and OS options to fine tune usage); but to so egregiously spout-off on them without any apparent use of them or scrutiny of the GreenPeace information (and the subsequent University academics; the article published is comparing dissimilar units, with configurations and production years that are vastly dissimilar; so the information is not really that comparable) provided leads your site to greater disregard for quality (which I have read for years and increasingly am finding is less and less relevant to actual off-grid awareness and living, is just poor on you.)

    Sorry, but you’ve become a site that I can’t take seriously anymore and hope that others do as well.

  6. auren

    Couldn’t possibly disagree with you more.

  7. Marc

    That’s ok, I’ve never bought an Apple product anyway lol