Fred Eaglesmith
by VEG-HEAD on APRIL 20, 2012 - 1 Comment in PEOPLE

Fred: Greens make him see Red

Canadian Country singer  Fred Eaglesmith is our kind of environmentalist.

“I’m not part of the trend. I’m not part of the Green Revolution,” he tells the Globe and Mail. “I don’t like the green revolution. Fashion is always a bad thing. It is very fashionable to be green right now. That means it will go away.”

He’s pushing a new album at the moment – needs to be a bit controversial, but we’re liking it.  Nick Rosen wrote an article a couple of years back – Brown is the new Green, and Eaglesmith is echoing that philosophy when he says “Corporations love it. Now they are marketing green. It’s just horrible. Green will go the way of the wide-legged pant.

“Remember the hemp revolution of the ’90s? Gone too. Green will go.

“The solution is not to be part of fashion. This comes from your heart. It doesn’t come from your head. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not against green. I’m against the trend. I’m against “cool.” If something is “cool,” that means it has a lifespan. All these little greenies walking around talkin’ their talk, they will go away. And that’s the trouble. It shouldn’t ever go away.

“I don’t know, I’m not a scientist. I’m skeptical when someone says there is global warming. Didn’t we start with an ice age?

Is this a blip in the screen? I don’t know. We humans have this thing where we automatically believe what people are telling us. How do we really know?

I can be skeptical in cases where people are making money and have reason to lie or hide the truth on environmental issues. But many concerned people have no monetary interest in environmental issues. Why would they lie?

They tell me scientists are making a lot of money on this. I don’t know. This is what I do know. Do you think that the scar of the tar sands are any worse than the scar of Mexico City?

“All this crap, the Liberal windmills in Ontario. The most beautiful spots decorated with these horrible-looking machines. Why didn’t they just spend all this money getting people to turn their lights off? We could have put all this money in conservation.

I was off the grid in the ’90s. I had solar and wind running my farm. There was such little power coming in off the solar and the windmill, we figured out how to save energy because we didn’t have it, that we could go back on the grid, our hydro bill was so low. There was no sense in having a windmill!

So the solution is conservation, not green or alternative technologies?

Yes. I believe we could do this on conservation. No problem. You are in an office now, aren’t you? Look around you.

It is air conditioned. It’s brightly lit …

Never mind that. You know those little wall warts? The little transformers that you pug in to charge your cell phone and whatnot. They take energy even when they are not being used. No one ever tells us that. The government never tells us that.

And why don’t our hydro meters look like a gas pumps – with dollars and cents on them? I’ll tell you why. People would say, “Holy Smokes! We’re at 40 bucks! Shut it off!” And they would. We could do this but it’s not cool and it’s not sexy. It’s so much more sexy for the government to put up those windmills and those solar panels than to just say, “Shut your lights off.”

Why hasn’t that been pushed? It seems a realistic – and much cheaper – alternative.

I’m with ya! Because it’s about cool. It looks cool!

As a mindful human being, if I had my way, there would be none of this. But that is not going to happen. A guy in the tar sands says, “I need a job so I am going to go rape the land.” And a guy in Mississauga says, “I need a house.” They are really doing the same thing, aren’t they?

People gotta live, people gotta work. So, instead of everybody being protesters, we need to find solutions and solution is not a cool movement.

People being what they are, greedily wanting more toys, more stuff for a better life, how are you going to get them to conserve?

Put a meter on their house that tells them how much money they are spending. Every time their fridge goes on, how much it costs. That’s a smart meter! How come our hydro meter has to be so hard to read? Could it be they don’t want you to know?

The Liberal government of Ontario is filling a leaking pail, efficiently. A big leak on the bottom and they say let’s put up windmills and solar panels. Ya gotta plug the leak. The leak is conservation.

 

1 comment

1 Alastair Stevens { 11.09.12 at 8:51 am }

Usually fallacy – unless you talk actual numbers, this makes no sense. We can’t conserve our way to nothing. There will still be a significant residual energy demand, and we have to meet that if we want to maintain a modern society. So how? http://www.withouthotair.com

Leave a Comment


Creative Commons license, which allows you to utilise all the information on this site for non-commercial purposes, providing you credit the information with the word 'off-grid.net', which should be written as one word and accompanied by a link to our web site.
View our creative commons license. View our Privacy Policy.

Vivum Intelligent Media Ltd. 2009
17 Scawfell Street
London E2 8NG

email nick (at) off-grid.net,
call US office:
toll-free 1-877-706-7423
OR
UK +44 207 729 2749