<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How I built a $100 solar panel (2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/</link>
	<description>renewable energy,survival,save money,self build,Green homes,Solar power, cheap power, 12 volt, Solar panels, Wind power, peak oil, Batteries, Inverter, Generator, Rainwater harvesting, survivalist, prepper, self-sufficient, vans, yurts, yachts, RVs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aryeh</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-296234</link>
		<dc:creator>aryeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-296234</guid>
		<description>panels are as low as $58 from www.sunelec.com now... i bought a pallet when it was that low, now u need to buy 2... but at $58 a panel for 60 watts, its favorable, albeit dealing with 67-89vdc is difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>panels are as low as $58 from <a href="http://www.sunelec.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sunelec.com</a> now&#8230; i bought a pallet when it was that low, now u need to buy 2&#8230; but at $58 a panel for 60 watts, its favorable, albeit dealing with 67-89vdc is difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New of grid guy</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-293184</link>
		<dc:creator>New of grid guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-293184</guid>
		<description>GREAT REPORT!
THANKS

I will add that you can get a 45 watt (3) panel solar system at Harbor Freight company on sale now for $199
But make one sounds fun too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT REPORT!<br />
THANKS</p>
<p>I will add that you can get a 45 watt (3) panel solar system at Harbor Freight company on sale now for $199<br />
But make one sounds fun too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-283910</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-283910</guid>
		<description>I did the math to see what kind of pay back you would get.
it runs at 3.3 amps at 18.88 volts = 62.304 Watts

Thats 0.062 KW it probably runs for about 360 hours a month on average (12 hours of day light a day) that means it makes 22.32 kWh at a constent rate.  At 23.3 cence a Kwh over a year this solar panel generates $62.41 dollars a year of energy.  This means at $100 your looking at 19.3 month pay back.  

If it lasted 10 years over 10 years you would save $523.72 per panel or $52.4 a year per panel over 10 years

Lets say you live somewhere cloudy it only works half the time at worse thats still a 38.6 month or just over 3 year pay back.  If it lasted 10 years over 10 years you would save $423.35 or $42.3 a year per panel over 10 years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the math to see what kind of pay back you would get.<br />
it runs at 3.3 amps at 18.88 volts = 62.304 Watts</p>
<p>Thats 0.062 KW it probably runs for about 360 hours a month on average (12 hours of day light a day) that means it makes 22.32 kWh at a constent rate.  At 23.3 cence a Kwh over a year this solar panel generates $62.41 dollars a year of energy.  This means at $100 your looking at 19.3 month pay back.  </p>
<p>If it lasted 10 years over 10 years you would save $523.72 per panel or $52.4 a year per panel over 10 years</p>
<p>Lets say you live somewhere cloudy it only works half the time at worse thats still a 38.6 month or just over 3 year pay back.  If it lasted 10 years over 10 years you would save $423.35 or $42.3 a year per panel over 10 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domestic Terrorist</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-280173</link>
		<dc:creator>Domestic Terrorist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-280173</guid>
		<description>mbthorman2010 - global warming is a hoax!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mbthorman2010 &#8211; global warming is a hoax!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-277253</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-277253</guid>
		<description>This is cool to see, I had wondered how people were claiming to be able to make their own solar panels cheap.  One of the things he doesn&#039;t mention in the cost part is what he spent for the plexiglass to cover the panels and it also sounds like he used a fair amount of caulking.  I know this sounds nitpicky but good caulking isn&#039;t cheap and plexiglass certainly isn&#039;t.  Either way, it&#039;s a tremendous savings over commercial panels.
Several people talked about ROI and costs to power your house, etc.
Something to keep in mind, in many states, Arizona included, there are incentives and rebates and such that require commercial grade stuff to get... just doing quick numbers, adding about what I suspect his cost would be by the time the plexiglass and such was added.

I put in a big system, about 10,000 watts and it was right about $70,000... the panels were about $56,000 of that.
Just to make the numbers easy, lets say I spent a total of $7/watt and the panel was $5.5/watt.
The remaining $1.5/watt was for inverters and installation.

Mike built his 60 Watt panel for roughly $120 (again, guessing for plexiglass, caulking, etc) or $2/watt.  Figure either way you need inverters and such, let&#039;s figure if you scaled this up you could do 10,000 watts for $3.50 ($2 + $1.50) per watt or a total of $35,000.

Cool... doing it yourself could save you $35,000... not too bad.

But... once my system was installed, inspected, and operational, I was eligible for $3/watt credit from the power company or $30,000, a $1000 state income tax credit, and a 30% federal tax credit ($70,000 * 30% equals about $21,000)

So... $70,000 - $30,000 - $21,000 - $1,000 equals roughly $18,000... and my system is connected into my house electrical panel and helps to run everything whenever the sun is out which in my area is the most expensive power.  I don&#039;t have to worry about a battery bank and the maintenance and dangers that go with that.

Mike did his because he doesn&#039;t have the grid available and I think it&#039;s wonderful.  As he says, he&#039;s using it to charge batteries and things so he doesn&#039;t need inverters, power company approval, or big banks of batteries... a very efficient and effective use of solar power.  But, for peope who want to scale up to making enough power to actually run a significant portion of their house, a commercial, licensed install can actually end up cheaper.

I welcome questions about this and will answer as time permits.  Please feel free to write me at yumadome@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is cool to see, I had wondered how people were claiming to be able to make their own solar panels cheap.  One of the things he doesn&#8217;t mention in the cost part is what he spent for the plexiglass to cover the panels and it also sounds like he used a fair amount of caulking.  I know this sounds nitpicky but good caulking isn&#8217;t cheap and plexiglass certainly isn&#8217;t.  Either way, it&#8217;s a tremendous savings over commercial panels.<br />
Several people talked about ROI and costs to power your house, etc.<br />
Something to keep in mind, in many states, Arizona included, there are incentives and rebates and such that require commercial grade stuff to get&#8230; just doing quick numbers, adding about what I suspect his cost would be by the time the plexiglass and such was added.</p>
<p>I put in a big system, about 10,000 watts and it was right about $70,000&#8230; the panels were about $56,000 of that.<br />
Just to make the numbers easy, lets say I spent a total of $7/watt and the panel was $5.5/watt.<br />
The remaining $1.5/watt was for inverters and installation.</p>
<p>Mike built his 60 Watt panel for roughly $120 (again, guessing for plexiglass, caulking, etc) or $2/watt.  Figure either way you need inverters and such, let&#8217;s figure if you scaled this up you could do 10,000 watts for $3.50 ($2 + $1.50) per watt or a total of $35,000.</p>
<p>Cool&#8230; doing it yourself could save you $35,000&#8230; not too bad.</p>
<p>But&#8230; once my system was installed, inspected, and operational, I was eligible for $3/watt credit from the power company or $30,000, a $1000 state income tax credit, and a 30% federal tax credit ($70,000 * 30% equals about $21,000)</p>
<p>So&#8230; $70,000 &#8211; $30,000 &#8211; $21,000 &#8211; $1,000 equals roughly $18,000&#8230; and my system is connected into my house electrical panel and helps to run everything whenever the sun is out which in my area is the most expensive power.  I don&#8217;t have to worry about a battery bank and the maintenance and dangers that go with that.</p>
<p>Mike did his because he doesn&#8217;t have the grid available and I think it&#8217;s wonderful.  As he says, he&#8217;s using it to charge batteries and things so he doesn&#8217;t need inverters, power company approval, or big banks of batteries&#8230; a very efficient and effective use of solar power.  But, for peope who want to scale up to making enough power to actually run a significant portion of their house, a commercial, licensed install can actually end up cheaper.</p>
<p>I welcome questions about this and will answer as time permits.  Please feel free to write me at <a href="mailto:yumadome@yahoo.com">yumadome@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Head</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-273282</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-273282</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the interesting article Mike.  I recently retired and bought a house in the country and hope to become as self-sufficient as possible.  I did a little research which I will present here as it may be of some interest.  I went to Ebay and found this ad...

&quot;This is for 108 5x6 cells we cut from larger cells[all cells are cut from something] we have resealed the cut edge with a high temp. electrical epoxy, these are factory detabs the tabbing was removed in the factory by hot air some solder has been blown around and there are some very small spots on some of the cells, that is easy to remove, these are easy to use the cell is pre tinned by the factory tabbing process, these are 6.7 AMP THATS RIGHT 6.7AMP .5V these are 16% eff. thats .226AMP per sq. inch. you can not buy the low power 3x6 cells this cheap, THIS IS THE REAL THING.&quot;

So each cell is (5&quot;)x(6&quot;)=30 sq.&quot; Each cell produces (30sq.&quot;)x(.226A)=6.78A. 6.78A x .5v = 3.39 watt (IxE=P). 108 x 3.39W = 366.12W total power. 108 x 30 sq.&quot; = 3240 sq. in. 144 sq. in. = 1 sq. ft. 3240 sq. in. = 22.5 sq. ft.

We can see from the above that our assembled panel will cover 22.5 sq. ft. and produce 366.12 Watts.  The solar cells are 16% efficient which is pretty good.  366.12watts/22.5sq.ft=16.272 watts/sq. ft.  In full sun, you can safely assume about 100 watts of solar energy per square foot. If this panel was 100% efficient we would expect to produce about 100 watts but we are producing 16.2 watts...so it is 16% efficient. 

If we assume 6 hours/day of full sun to allow for cloudy days and seasonal changes we will produce 366.12 watt x 6/hr. = 2196.72 watt (2.197 KW)/day. I live in North Carolina and I pay $0.12/KWH, which is the national average, so...$0.12/kwh x 2.197kw = $0.26364/day.  This panel would produce about 25 cents worth of electricity per day for me if I used it directly as a direct current source (DC). If I stored it in a battery for later use I would only be able to recover about 80% ($0.26x.8=$0.20), or 20 cents.  If I recover the energy using an inverter to convert to 120v AC it would be considerable less due to the inherent losses.

The 108 cells were advertised at $150.00 + $17.44 = $167.44 (cost + shipping). The payback would then be $167.44 / 0.26/day = 635.108481262 days (1.740023236 years = 1yr,9mo.). If I add in the cost of building the frame...lets say it all comes to a total of $300.00 then the payback becomes $300 / .26364/day = 1138 days (3.12 years = 3yr,1.5mo.). Not too bad expecially if their was any rebates available from local, state or federal.    

According to the US Department of Energy, an average American household used approximately 866-kilowatt hours per month in 1999 costing them $70.68.  Now it would be $104.00./mo.

For anyone interested David Butcher has a design for a human pedal powered generator that can produce about 300 watts per hour of exercise, which if added to this solar powered setup would double the amount of energy produced. http://www.los-gatos.ca.us/davidbu/pedgen.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the interesting article Mike.  I recently retired and bought a house in the country and hope to become as self-sufficient as possible.  I did a little research which I will present here as it may be of some interest.  I went to Ebay and found this ad&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;This is for 108 5&#215;6 cells we cut from larger cells[all cells are cut from something] we have resealed the cut edge with a high temp. electrical epoxy, these are factory detabs the tabbing was removed in the factory by hot air some solder has been blown around and there are some very small spots on some of the cells, that is easy to remove, these are easy to use the cell is pre tinned by the factory tabbing process, these are 6.7 AMP THATS RIGHT 6.7AMP .5V these are 16% eff. thats .226AMP per sq. inch. you can not buy the low power 3&#215;6 cells this cheap, THIS IS THE REAL THING.&#8221;</p>
<p>So each cell is (5&#8243;)x(6&#8243;)=30 sq.&#8221; Each cell produces (30sq.&#8221;)x(.226A)=6.78A. 6.78A x .5v = 3.39 watt (IxE=P). 108 x 3.39W = 366.12W total power. 108 x 30 sq.&#8221; = 3240 sq. in. 144 sq. in. = 1 sq. ft. 3240 sq. in. = 22.5 sq. ft.</p>
<p>We can see from the above that our assembled panel will cover 22.5 sq. ft. and produce 366.12 Watts.  The solar cells are 16% efficient which is pretty good.  366.12watts/22.5sq.ft=16.272 watts/sq. ft.  In full sun, you can safely assume about 100 watts of solar energy per square foot. If this panel was 100% efficient we would expect to produce about 100 watts but we are producing 16.2 watts&#8230;so it is 16% efficient. </p>
<p>If we assume 6 hours/day of full sun to allow for cloudy days and seasonal changes we will produce 366.12 watt x 6/hr. = 2196.72 watt (2.197 KW)/day. I live in North Carolina and I pay $0.12/KWH, which is the national average, so&#8230;$0.12/kwh x 2.197kw = $0.26364/day.  This panel would produce about 25 cents worth of electricity per day for me if I used it directly as a direct current source (DC). If I stored it in a battery for later use I would only be able to recover about 80% ($0.26x.8=$0.20), or 20 cents.  If I recover the energy using an inverter to convert to 120v AC it would be considerable less due to the inherent losses.</p>
<p>The 108 cells were advertised at $150.00 + $17.44 = $167.44 (cost + shipping). The payback would then be $167.44 / 0.26/day = 635.108481262 days (1.740023236 years = 1yr,9mo.). If I add in the cost of building the frame&#8230;lets say it all comes to a total of $300.00 then the payback becomes $300 / .26364/day = 1138 days (3.12 years = 3yr,1.5mo.). Not too bad expecially if their was any rebates available from local, state or federal.    </p>
<p>According to the US Department of Energy, an average American household used approximately 866-kilowatt hours per month in 1999 costing them $70.68.  Now it would be $104.00./mo.</p>
<p>For anyone interested David Butcher has a design for a human pedal powered generator that can produce about 300 watts per hour of exercise, which if added to this solar powered setup would double the amount of energy produced. <a href="http://www.los-gatos.ca.us/davidbu/pedgen.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.los-gatos.ca.us/davidbu/pedgen.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-272712</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-272712</guid>
		<description>@Dick, did you miss the part where the author mentioned his eventual use for the solar panel was located *OFF GRID*? 

@Brendon, where did you get the idea the author was your own personal slave? Grow a braincell and then learn how to think for yourself already.

Why is it that braindead morons always try to ruin it for everybody else?

To the author: Thanks for the write-up and the inspiration. I plan to use some of the ideas you portrayed here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dick, did you miss the part where the author mentioned his eventual use for the solar panel was located *OFF GRID*? </p>
<p>@Brendon, where did you get the idea the author was your own personal slave? Grow a braincell and then learn how to think for yourself already.</p>
<p>Why is it that braindead morons always try to ruin it for everybody else?</p>
<p>To the author: Thanks for the write-up and the inspiration. I plan to use some of the ideas you portrayed here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbthorman2010</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-271418</link>
		<dc:creator>mbthorman2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-271418</guid>
		<description>I live in rural/forested area of Costa Rica on the slopes of a mountain.  One gets used to having to have independent back up systems when living in such environments.  As global warming progresses almost unchecked, we also need to thing about how we will provide basics for survival.  In my area the most important resource which is endangered is water.  I am planning now for rain water collection systems, recycling of water used, and ways to minimize water usage.  Some of this requires solar powered pumping and wind power added to the mix for generating essential energy.  A very small farm such as mine can produce enough food to sustain a family of four or five as long as we have water available for irrigation as our water resources begin drying up.  Knowing how to make one&#039;s own solar panels, wind turbines, and water recovery systems is a matter of survival.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in rural/forested area of Costa Rica on the slopes of a mountain.  One gets used to having to have independent back up systems when living in such environments.  As global warming progresses almost unchecked, we also need to thing about how we will provide basics for survival.  In my area the most important resource which is endangered is water.  I am planning now for rain water collection systems, recycling of water used, and ways to minimize water usage.  Some of this requires solar powered pumping and wind power added to the mix for generating essential energy.  A very small farm such as mine can produce enough food to sustain a family of four or five as long as we have water available for irrigation as our water resources begin drying up.  Knowing how to make one&#8217;s own solar panels, wind turbines, and water recovery systems is a matter of survival.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wretha</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-263428</link>
		<dc:creator>Wretha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-263428</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dick&lt;/strong&gt;, not everyone is concerned with ROI, at least not in the traditional sense. I guarantee you, when the lights in your city, or even on your block, when you are sitting there with the only lights on in the area, ROI takes on a whole new meaning.

Being independent from the system has a lot of value in itself. I am 100% off grid, I generate all of my own power and store it in batteries, I didn&#039;t break the bank to get here, I can tell you from experience how good it feels when the power goes out in the neighborhood and I&#039;m not even aware of it. 

With the aging utility infrastructure, more and more people getting on the grid, we are just one hot summer, one extra cold winter blizzard/ice storm, one hurricane away from major power outages. Being energy independent, even on a small scale (ie your house), is priceless.

But it&#039;s ok with me if you want to sit back and spout ROI numbers as an excuse/reason not to get off the grid, or at least have some sort of backup system, those of us who look at life though a different lens will be sitting in our lit up houses while you will end up sitting in the dark, hope your numbers keep you warm and bright. :)

Wretha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dick</strong>, not everyone is concerned with ROI, at least not in the traditional sense. I guarantee you, when the lights in your city, or even on your block, when you are sitting there with the only lights on in the area, ROI takes on a whole new meaning.</p>
<p>Being independent from the system has a lot of value in itself. I am 100% off grid, I generate all of my own power and store it in batteries, I didn&#8217;t break the bank to get here, I can tell you from experience how good it feels when the power goes out in the neighborhood and I&#8217;m not even aware of it. </p>
<p>With the aging utility infrastructure, more and more people getting on the grid, we are just one hot summer, one extra cold winter blizzard/ice storm, one hurricane away from major power outages. Being energy independent, even on a small scale (ie your house), is priceless.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s ok with me if you want to sit back and spout ROI numbers as an excuse/reason not to get off the grid, or at least have some sort of backup system, those of us who look at life though a different lens will be sitting in our lit up houses while you will end up sitting in the dark, hope your numbers keep you warm and bright. :)</p>
<p>Wretha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-262479</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-262479</guid>
		<description>The solar panel appears to make 60 watts at full sun. Assuming an very optimistic 8 hours a day for 365 days that is 175 kwh of power.  Electric prices vary but using 15  cents per kwh this would work out to $26.50 of power per year, or 4 years just t0o break even.
As to lighting a 60 watt bulb or several compact fluorescents you need 120 volt AC for the latter which means buying an inverter. Also you probably donot need the light bulbs midday but at night, so some battery storage would be desirable, another expense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solar panel appears to make 60 watts at full sun. Assuming an very optimistic 8 hours a day for 365 days that is 175 kwh of power.  Electric prices vary but using 15  cents per kwh this would work out to $26.50 of power per year, or 4 years just t0o break even.<br />
As to lighting a 60 watt bulb or several compact fluorescents you need 120 volt AC for the latter which means buying an inverter. Also you probably donot need the light bulbs midday but at night, so some battery storage would be desirable, another expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-262189</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-262189</guid>
		<description>Awesome, pure awesomeness, though many people commenting are obviously ignorant what really has been achieved here. (i can&#039;t spell by the way, put that down to be a programmer).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, pure awesomeness, though many people commenting are obviously ignorant what really has been achieved here. (i can&#8217;t spell by the way, put that down to be a programmer).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tammyer</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-261777</link>
		<dc:creator>tammyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-261777</guid>
		<description>I say let all the auto makers go under. If that means we drive Toyota&#039;s, Nissan&#039;s and Honda&#039;s then so be it. If the American automakers had been thinking about the future instead of marketing and making million on over sized SUV&#039;s then they wouldn&#039;t be in the trouble they are in now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say let all the auto makers go under. If that means we drive Toyota&#8217;s, Nissan&#8217;s and Honda&#8217;s then so be it. If the American automakers had been thinking about the future instead of marketing and making million on over sized SUV&#8217;s then they wouldn&#8217;t be in the trouble they are in now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tammyer</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-261776</link>
		<dc:creator>tammyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-261776</guid>
		<description>The local codes in most areas in the US won&#039;t allow you to install a homemade solar panel on your house, it needs to be UL listed. Don&#039;t believe all of those bogus sites that promise you can power your house for $200, you can&#039;t. Also, besides the solar panel, you also need an approved inverter to convert the DC power from the solar panels to AC that your appliances need.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The local codes in most areas in the US won&#8217;t allow you to install a homemade solar panel on your house, it needs to be UL listed. Don&#8217;t believe all of those bogus sites that promise you can power your house for $200, you can&#8217;t. Also, besides the solar panel, you also need an approved inverter to convert the DC power from the solar panels to AC that your appliances need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-259826</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-259826</guid>
		<description>brendon - 
energy savings depend on how much you&#039;re currently paying. 
the panel described is putting out 18.9V, 3.05 A, which is just under 60W.
That means in full sunlight it&#039;s generating enough power to keep a horribly inefficient light bulb bright, or a 4-5 efficient ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brendon &#8211;<br />
energy savings depend on how much you&#8217;re currently paying.<br />
the panel described is putting out 18.9V, 3.05 A, which is just under 60W.<br />
That means in full sunlight it&#8217;s generating enough power to keep a horribly inefficient light bulb bright, or a 4-5 efficient ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Menasian</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/12/10/how-i-built-a-100-solar-panel-2/comment-page-1/#comment-259030</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Menasian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4281#comment-259030</guid>
		<description>It is preferable to use low temperature solder for solar cells, particularly if the cells have no tabs. Normal 63/37 SnPb solder flows at a rather high temperature for this application. Special low temperature solders containing various elements such as indium, antimony and silver are available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is preferable to use low temperature solder for solar cells, particularly if the cells have no tabs. Normal 63/37 SnPb solder flows at a rather high temperature for this application. Special low temperature solders containing various elements such as indium, antimony and silver are available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

