<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senators back mini-nuke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.off-grid.net/2009/11/22/senators-back-mini-nuke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/11/22/senators-back-mini-nuke/</link>
	<description>renewable energy,survival,save money,self build,Green homes,Solar power, cheap power, 12 volt, Solar panels, Wind power, peak oil, Batteries, Inverter, Generator, Rainwater harvesting, survivalist, prepper, self-sufficient, vans, yurts, yachts, RVs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Healey BE NZCE Dip Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/11/22/senators-back-mini-nuke/comment-page-1/#comment-268094</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Healey BE NZCE Dip Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 05:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4227#comment-268094</guid>
		<description>Australia needs this tecnology.

Hyperion type mini reactors can be &quot;clipped onto&quot; existing coal fired power plants. Low capital cost. Existing grids/staff/other infrastructure. No need for Nuclear Plant Operators...none available in Australia.

LTC (Low Temperature Conversion) plants can be added to process brown coal from existing coal mines into Diesile, Kerosine  and petro chem products.  Clean carbon residue from LTC process can be burt in existing power plant furnaces during economic life run down of same.  (Followed at a later date by hydogenation of clean carbon residue to produce petro chems.)

Organic agricultural wastes (wheat straw, sugar cane trash, feed lot trash, prunings, weeds), bush fire fuel load reductions, city garbage, and commercial forestry trash such as prunings, bark, off cuts, sawdust and shavings can also be processed in these LTC plants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia needs this tecnology.</p>
<p>Hyperion type mini reactors can be &#8220;clipped onto&#8221; existing coal fired power plants. Low capital cost. Existing grids/staff/other infrastructure. No need for Nuclear Plant Operators&#8230;none available in Australia.</p>
<p>LTC (Low Temperature Conversion) plants can be added to process brown coal from existing coal mines into Diesile, Kerosine  and petro chem products.  Clean carbon residue from LTC process can be burt in existing power plant furnaces during economic life run down of same.  (Followed at a later date by hydogenation of clean carbon residue to produce petro chems.)</p>
<p>Organic agricultural wastes (wheat straw, sugar cane trash, feed lot trash, prunings, weeds), bush fire fuel load reductions, city garbage, and commercial forestry trash such as prunings, bark, off cuts, sawdust and shavings can also be processed in these LTC plants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/11/22/senators-back-mini-nuke/comment-page-1/#comment-255419</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4227#comment-255419</guid>
		<description>I think rather than fund one dime, all we really need to do is allow for some limited companies that specialize in this to e allowed to be research. But I don&#039;t believe we should be using our tax dollars to pay for private corporation research. 

#1 I agree with your statement, small towns could really benefit from this advancement. 

Anyway, interesting article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think rather than fund one dime, all we really need to do is allow for some limited companies that specialize in this to e allowed to be research. But I don&#8217;t believe we should be using our tax dollars to pay for private corporation research. </p>
<p>#1 I agree with your statement, small towns could really benefit from this advancement. </p>
<p>Anyway, interesting article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.off-grid.net/2009/11/22/senators-back-mini-nuke/comment-page-1/#comment-247283</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.off-grid.net/?p=4227#comment-247283</guid>
		<description>I know most people who want to live &quot;off-grid&quot; are probably rugged individualists, but I like to think of all of those wonderful small towns that are not well connected to the grid. 

There is a town in Alaska, for example, named Galena. It is interested in replacing its current &quot;off-grid&quot; power source, which consists of aging diesel generators that burn fuel brought by barge during the summer months and stored in very large tanks left over from when the US Air Force maintained an active base there.

Toshiba is working with the town to be the initial host of a 10 MWe nuclear power system that is designed to run for at least 30 years without any new fuel. That kind of development would enable off-grid towns to be a completely different and cleaner kind of place.

Rod Adams
Publisher, Atomic Insights</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know most people who want to live &#8220;off-grid&#8221; are probably rugged individualists, but I like to think of all of those wonderful small towns that are not well connected to the grid. </p>
<p>There is a town in Alaska, for example, named Galena. It is interested in replacing its current &#8220;off-grid&#8221; power source, which consists of aging diesel generators that burn fuel brought by barge during the summer months and stored in very large tanks left over from when the US Air Force maintained an active base there.</p>
<p>Toshiba is working with the town to be the initial host of a 10 MWe nuclear power system that is designed to run for at least 30 years without any new fuel. That kind of development would enable off-grid towns to be a completely different and cleaner kind of place.</p>
<p>Rod Adams<br />
Publisher, Atomic Insights</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

